Thursday, 12 June 2014

OBAMA memetik program SENJATA Rampasan AUSTRALIA Sebagai Contoh bagi Amerika Syarikat . . .

U.S. President Barack Obama (Reuters/Pascal Rossignol)

Srikandi גבורה Pentadbiran Obama mungkin mencari contoh di Australia sebagai White House menganggap undang-undang senjata api potensi baru bagi Amerika Syarikat di tengah yang terbaru dalam siri tembakan di sekolah yang dahsyat.

Presiden Amerika Syarikat, Barack Obama dinamakan peraturan senjata di bawah Amerika di bawah sekutu dalam ucapan yang disiarkan di web pada petang Selasa beberapa jam sahaja selepas lelaki bersenjata yang memasuki sekolah yang tinggi berhampiran Portland, Oregon dan melepaskan tembakan, membunuh pelajar.

"Kekecewaan terbesar saya setakat ini adalah hakikat bahawa masyarakat ini belum bersedia untuk mengambil beberapa langkah-langkah asas untuk menjaga senapang daripada tangan orang - orang yang boleh melakukan kerosakan hanya sukar dipercayai.

Kami satu-satunya negara maju di bumi di mana ini berlaku. Dan ia berlaku kini sekali seminggu. Dan ia adalah satu kisah satu hari. Tidak ada tempat lain seperti ini, "kata Presiden.

"Beberapa dekad yang lalu Australia mempunyai menembak massa sama dengan Columbine atau Newtown, dan Australia hanya berkata, 'Nah, itu sahaja. Kami tidak lakukan - kita tidak melihat itu lagi, 'dan pada dasarnya yang dikenakan sangat teruk, undang-undang senjata api sukar, dan sejak mereka tdk mempunyai massa menembak.

Maksud saya, tahap keganasan senjata kami berada di luar carta. Tidak ada maju, negara maju yang lain di bumi yang akan bersabar dengan ini, "tambah Obama.

Presiden itu mungkin merujuk kepada mengamuk 1996 berhampiran penjara koloni Port Arthur di tenggara Tasmania, Australia di mana Martin Bryant, 28, membunuh 35 orang dan mencederakan 23 yang lain dalam satu jam panjang menembak pembeli.

Setelah sokongan yang amat menggalakkan daripada penduduk Australia, 1996 National Perjanjian Senjata Api telah diluluskan tidak lama kemudian, seterusnya meng-haramkan panjang berlaras senapang separa automatik dan mewujudkan tem-poh menunggu 28 hari untuk pembelian senjata api.

Kerajaan juga memulakan program pembelian balik wajib besar-besaran yang dila-porkan telah dipotong 2 bilangan pistol-memiliki isi rumah.

Ke atas 95 % peratus daripada warga Australia ditinjau selepas pembunuhan beramai-ramai Port Arthur berkata mereka menggemari undang-undang senjata api yang lebih ketat seperti ini, dan tembakan massa telah tidak berlaku di benua dalam hampir sejak 2 dekad.

OBAMA Cites Australia’s gun Confiscation program 
As Example for US . . .

The Obama administration may be looking for an example in Australia as the White House considers potential new firearm laws for the United States in the wake of the latest in a series of devastating school shootings.

US President Barack Obama cited gun rules in America’s down under ally during remarks that were broadcast on the web Tuesday afternoon only hours after a gunman entered a high school near Portland, Oregon and opened fire, killing a student.

“My biggest frustration so far is the fact that this society has not been willing to take some basic steps to keep guns out of the hands of people who can do just unbelievable damage. We’re the only developed country on earth where this happens. And it happens now once a week. And it’s a one-day story. There’s no place else like this,” the president said.

“A couple of decades ago Australia had a mass shooting similar to Columbine or Newtown, and Australia just said, ‘Well, that’s it. We’re not doing - we’re not seeing that again,’ and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws, and they haven’t had a mass shooting since.

I mean, our levels of gun violence are off the charts. There’s no other advanced, developed country on earth that would put up with this,” Obama added.

The president was likely referring to a 1996 rampage near the Port Arthur prison colony in south-eastern Tasmania, Australia in which Martin Bryant, 28, killed 35 people and wounded 23 others during an hours-long shooting spree. Upon the overwhelming support of the Australia population, the 1996 National Firearms Agreement was passed soon after, in turn outlawing long-barreled semi-automatic guns and establishing a 28-day wait period for firearm purchases.

The government also began a massive mandatory buyback program that is reported to have cut in half the number of gun-owning households.

Upwards of 95 percent of Australians polled after the Port Arthur massacre said they favored more stringent gun laws like these, and mass shootings have not occurred in the continent in the nearly two decades since.

Kawan-kawan, keluarga dan juga mengambil berat memegang lilin untuk Emilio Hoffman, mangsa menembak sekolah hari ini dalam satu perhimpunan nyalaan pada 10 Jun 2014 di Troutdale, Oregon (Friends, family and well-wishers hold candles for Emilio Hoffman, the victim of today's school shooting at a vigil on June 10, 2014 in Troutdale, Oregon (Natalie Behring/Getty Images/AFP)

"Secara keseluruhannya, senjata api dan senjata api pembunuhan kadar bunuh diri telah tren semakin ke bawah melalui tahun 1980-an dan awal 1990-an, tetapi kejatuhan dipercepatkan selepas pembelian balik itu.

Menganalisis variasi dalam jumlah senjata bertukar dalam untuk pembelian balik antara negara, kita sekali lagi mendapati keputusan yang sama: di negeri-negeri di mana lebih senjata api telah dibeli semula, terdapat penurunan yang lebih besar dalam kematian senjata api, "Andrew Leigh, jurucakap perbendaharaan Pembantu untuk Buruh Pembangkang di Australia, menulis dalam sebuah ‘op-ed’ untuk majalah Time diterbitkan lebih awal ini bulan lebih awal daripada menembak Selasa di Troutdale, Oregon.

"Pada dekad dan setengah sejak pistol pembelian balik Australia, bilangan senjata api bagi setiap orang telah tinggal tetap, dan kematian senjata kekal bersyukur rendah."

Jika program pembelian balik dan pengenalan undang-undang baru telah dianggap di Amerika Syarikat, yang sama menjejaskan dilihat di Australia bermakna bahawa seramai 40 juta senjata api akan dibawa pergi.

Walau bagaimanapun, sokongan orang ramai di negeri-negeri adalah jauh daripada apa yang jelas dalam jawatan-Port Arthur pembunuhan beramai-ramai Australia.

Selepas 2 dozen orang dibiarkan mati pada akhir 2012 apabila menembak massa berlaku di sebuah sekolah tinggi di Newtown, Connecticut, hanya 52 % peratus dari-pada rakyat Amerika yang dikaji selidik oleh Washington Post dan ABC News berkata mereka menggemari undang-undang senjata api baru yang ketat. Setahun kemudian, mereka mahu reformasi sekali lagi dalam minoriti.

Pada hari Selasa, White House timbalan prinsipal setiausaha akhbar Josh Earnest memberitahu pemberita bahawa "Matlamat Presiden adalah untuk mencari peluang untuk bertindak secara pentadbiran, secara unilateral menggunakan kuasa eksekutif untuk cuba untuk membuat masyarakat kita lebih selamat."

Pentadbiran mengatakan hurtles, bagaimanapun, hasil daripada telah penggubal undang2 yang mahu sedikit untuk apa-apa kaitan dengan usaha White House.

"Kami sentiasa mencari peluang-peluang," tambah Earnest. "Tetapi tidak seorang pun daripada peluang-peluang apabila mereka hadir diri mereka akan menjadi pengganti yang boleh diterima untuk tindakan perundangan yang teguh."

"Jika pendapat awam tidak menuntut perubahan di Kongres, ia tidak akan berubah," Pres. Obama berkata semasa sesi soal jawab pada hari Selasa yang dihoskan oleh laman web Tumblr itu. "Kami tidak mempunyai alat yang cukup sekarang untuk membuat sebesar penyok seperti yang kita perlu."

"Soalan saya rasa benar-benar menghadapi ahli parlimen sekarang adalah apa langkah-langkah akal Demokrat dan Republikan boleh diambil untuk mengurangkan kemungkinan keganasan senjata," tambah Earnest.

"Dan ada yang beberapa, dan mereka malangnya telah ‘bottled up’ sehingga di Kongres dan itu adalah kekecewaan kepada Presiden. Tetapi itu tidak akan menghalang presiden daripada terus menolak untuk langkah-langkah pentadbiran yang boleh kita ambil untuk membantu mengurangkan keganasan senjata."

“Overall, the firearms homicide and firearms suicide rates had been trending steadily downwards through the 1980s and early 1990s, but the fall accelerated after the buyback.

Analyzing variations in the amount of guns turned in for buyback between states, we again found the same result: in states where more firearms were bought back, there was a bigger drop in gun deaths,” Andrew Leigh, the assistant treasury spokesperson for the Labor Opposition in Australia, wrote in an op-ed for Time magazine published earlier this month - ahead of Tuesday’s shooting in Troutdale, Oregon.

“In the decade and a half since the Australian gun buyback, the number of firearms per person has stayed constant, and gun deaths have remained thankfully low.”

If a buyback program and the introduction of new laws were considered in the US, the same affect seen in Australia would mean that as many as 40 million firearms would be taken away.

Nevertheless, public support in the states is far from what was evident in post-Port Arthur massacre Australia. After two-dozen people were left dead in late 2012 when a mass shooting occurred at a high school in Newtown, Connecticut, only 52 percent of Americans surveyed by the Washington Post and ABC News said they favored stringent new gun laws. A year later, those wanting reform were once again in the minority.

On Tuesday, White House principal deputy press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters that “The president’s goal is to look for opportunities to act administratively, unilaterally using his executive authority to try to make our communities safer.” The administration says hurtles, however, have been the result of lawmakers who want little to nothing to do with the White House’s efforts.

“We’re always looking for those opportunities,” Earnest added. “But none of those opportunities when they present themselves is going to be an acceptable substitute for robust legislative action.”

“If public opinion does not demand change in Congress, it will not change,” Pres. Obama said during Tuesday’s question-and-answer session hosted by the website Tumblr. “We don’t have enough tools right now to make as big a dent as we need to.”

“The question I think really facing lawmakers right now is what common sense steps can Democrats and Republicans take to reduce the likelihood of gun violence,” added Earnest.

“And there are some, and they have unfortunately been bottled up in Congress and that is a disappointment to the president. But that’s not going to stop the president from continuing to push for administrative steps that we can take to help reduce gun violence.”


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...